But is that really so bad? No pre-Avatar movie to date has come close to extracating the full potential of 3D and Imax film. I predict that this movie is going to set in motion a technological race in Hollywood comparable to the defunct “Star Wars” program initiated by the Regan administration in th early 80's. Film makers and studios will begin clamouring to push the bounds of 3D and Imax, even beyond the seemingly untraversable path blazed by Cameron and his team. Sure, we'll see a fair share of duds invading theaters, but it's up to audience members to determine whether or not a film can stand next to Avatar. I personally cannot wait for the next few years in film making. “GET SOME!”

As far as 3D goes, I really hope Hollywood doesn't think success equals 3D. I loved Avatar, every bit of it. But was the movie made great by 3D? No, it already was great but was made an event by 3D. Cameron already made an epic tale, but made it better with 3D. A shitty movie in 3D will still be shitty. But I seriously do not want to wear 3D glasses for every movie I see. And if I see a shity movie in 3D I will be pissed I wore those glasses for 2 hours and paid 3 extra bucks. The glasses are annoying and dim the screen, almost like a crappy pair of sunglasses. (I know they bring out the 3D, but the dimming effect sucks) Until they can find a more revolutionary way to present 3D I do not need to spend an extra 3 bucks to see it. The extra dough for the “technology” is really stupid too. I like the idea of only a few 3D experiences a year, but its Hollywood and they'll exploit the shit out of this.