Jul.15 2009

Trav’s Review: Harry Potter & The Half-Blood Prince Is Phenomenal

By Travis Andries

harry potter

GRADE: A

It’s nearing midnight on Tuesday July 14, 2009. For several hours movie-goers have been pacing the concourse in front of local theaters across the United States waiting to see the latest installment in J.K. Rowling’s beloved Harry Potter franchise. Some of the patrons are dressed in school outfits, some carry wands, most are dressed in true muggle fashion. Nevertheless, each person about to enter their respective cinema has waited an extra eight months for this night. And for good reason.

The critically acclaimed Half-Blood Prince proved to equal and surpass all the hype surrounding this summer’s must see film. By catering to the passions of a crazed fan-base by combining an exquisite score, superb performances, and the directorial stylings of David Yates; the latest Potter engagement has the potential to obliterate box-office expectations as well as cash in during award season as well.

I must admit that this is the first Potter film that I have seen after reading the books. I wasn’t sure what kind of impact this would have on my viewing, but I can assure you that I was not disappointed. Yes there were a few moments that left me wanting more, and one scene that left me wishing I had the opportunity to direct this installment. However, the film as a whole was completely satisfying and even more at times.

While reading the books during the summer of 2008 (I read all seven for the first time in 10 days and was instantly a fan), I always felt that “Prince” was not only the best of the series, but also the only that could stand alone. The prickles of teen romance, the humor of everyday situations of a 16 year-old, and the development of Severus Snape as perhaps the most intriguing character in recent literature all aid the story in its conquest of the minds of readers across the globe. The same can be said for the film.

Prince is outrageously funny with brilliant performances from the film’s young stars Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, instead of tongue-in-cheek one liners. Grint finally is able to match the dynamism that Watson and Radcliffe have shown in earlier editions of the series. Alongside new comers Jessie Cave (Lavender Brown) and Freddie Stroma (Cormac McLaggen), the three primary Gryffindors reach into the heart of all movie-goers by reminding the elder of us what it was like to be a teenager in love and showing the younger of us just how crazy we can be. Cave in particular has a knack for delivering teen awkwardness whenever on screen. She is simply brilliant.

However, the true star of this film is Tom Felton (Draco Malfoy). His emotions leap off the screen and right inside of every member in the audience. When Felton is assaulting Potter on the train, you understand his disgust. When he is crying alone in a Hogwart’s lavatory, you sympathize with his remorse. And when he is atop the tower, wand shaking in hand, voice quaking with each syllable; you know his fear in the face of an impossible task. With most of his acting career having been devoted to the Potter franchise, Felton has not had sufficient time to delve into other projects. I expect bright things in his future.

malfoy

As noted earlier, the film boasts one of the finest scores to accompany a film in my opinion. Each episode of the series has delivered handsomely on the music side, but Prince especially uses the score to the fullest advantage. Composer Nicholas Hooper deserves as much credit as the actors and Yates for the quality of the film.

Despite the praise given forthwith there will doubtlessly be many who do not view the film in such high esteem. “Potter purists” (people who feel that every film leaves out too much or takes too many liberties with the source material) will certainly debate many of Yates’ omissions for this film. I went to the film with several close friends. Each of them can be considered a Potter purist and had a few grievances with the film. The most common complaint was the prevalence of Bellatrix Lestrange, played by Helena Bonham Carter, in the film; most notably during the Death Eater “invasion” of Hogwarts. Likewise the attack on the Burrow (the home of the Weasley family), which takes place about half-way through the film, received less than stellar reactions from the purists in the audience. Nevertheless, these few discrepancies between film and text cannot detract from the magnitude of this film’s power. It manages the daunting task of delivering a glimmer of hope to a world that has begun to breach the surface of its darkest reaches.

My personal thoughts on the film are that it was two minutes away from being unquestionably great. Those two minutes comprise my least favorite part of the film, which is unfortunately the climax. A decision by the screenwriter to modify the return of Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) and Potter to Hogwarts, by placing Potter a floor beneath Dumbledore instead of hidden and immobilized across from him. This forces Yates to show the pivotal scene of the film from Potter’s point of view. Looking through the cracks in the floor boards, the audience only catches a glimpse of Severus Snape (Alan Rickman) deliver the killing curse to Dumbledore. This obscured and floor up view severely limits the emotional impact of Snape’s betrayal. I was utterly disappointed by this sequence.

In an excellent display of coincidental symmetry, my favorite scene in the film is actually the opening scene. It is a flash black to the time immediately following the death of Sirius Black. Yates slows down the camera to show a battered and exhausted Potter being embraced by Dumbledore as a dozen or so flashbulbs go off undoubtedly taking photos for the front page of the Daily Prophet. The pace and lighting give the audience insight into the pressures of being the most famous wizard in the world while standing next to the worlds most powerful wizard. As Potter blinks stagnantly as the bulbs flicker, one can understand for the briefest of moments what it would feel like to be 16 and humanity’s last true hope against an impossible evil. Yates uses this shot to set the stakes for the climactic last three films that will decided the fate of not only the wizarding world but the muggle world as well, while simultaneously demonstrating that if given the right amount of time and creative latitude, the final Potter films have the potential to achieve the greatest achievements in film making.

In a sentence: this film returns movie-goers to the long abandoned realm of teen complexity with immaculate precision against the backdrop of a world on the precipice of universal peril.

What should you do? See this film as soon as you have the time. The Potter films are no longer just for children. It is time that the adults got on board.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
If YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY, SHARE THIS POST...OR ELSE!!!
  • MySpace
  • Google
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
Filed Under:harry potter and the half-blood prince, movie review
Categories : Reviews
  • matthewdeery
    They changed so much about the cave, castle and death of dumbledore. I thought the ending was probably the worst part of that movie because it was so different from the book and it seemed a lot less dangerous than everything Jk described....why are we still discussing this? haha.
  • thekaratefuck
    My last two posts are supposed to be flip-flopped so if someone does read them, read the bottom one first and then the top.
  • thekaratefuck
    The lack of a scuffle at the end of this film is a very big, glaring problem but the fact that someone gave this film an A is a little unnerving as well. While not terrible, it is definitely not one of the best movies I have ever seen. An A movie, in my humble opinion, is a movie with very little flaws. It may have a few flaws but definitely not as many as this or any of the Harry Potter films have been allowed to have. I understand that the books are long and there is a lot of material to cut down into one movie (for the seventh, two) but an A movie, this is not. It's worlds better than Goblet of Fire and is probably the third or fourth most solid film behind the first two and MAYBE Order of the Phoenix. Half Blood Prince had some jokey elements which were ok, some serious elements which I just can't seem to take seriously in these films, and the exclusion of many main characters.
  • thekaratefuck
    It will be very interesting to see how they end the series with how many important plot points that have been left out in the films. The best part (I feel anyway) about this film was the ending. The ending was almost exactly how I had pictured it except for the wizard battle as the Death Eaters left Hogwarts. Other than that, this Potter film was quite worthy and surpassed many in the series. An A, it was not but Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince was definitely a solid B film.
  • Moosh
    While the part at the Burrow was a lil superfluous, it did succeed in showing the audience that which Harry had been dreading all along, and his reasons for deciding not to come back to Hogwarts for his seventh year. The moment shows that Harry's loved ones and friends will always be in danger as long as Harry's with them.
  • Respectfullyno
    If Weenis took the time to read the comments and all he has to say is that the commentators are losers than I don't see why he read them in the first place. Going back to topic and leaving Weenis with a "deal with it nerd", I see where Jordan is coming from on a lot of levels. After watching the movie I did feel, let down would be the word after waiting for the battle scene at Hogwarts. It leaves the viewers wanting more as Travis said in his article. I do not know why they left out that scene because it is not a time issue concern since no Harry Potter fanatic would ever mind an additional 10 minutes of wizardry duels. As for the "need for comedic relief" there wasn't a need for it, it only made the movie that much better. Humor is not needed when reading a book because it can be picked up and put down at the readers discretion. While at a movie it is a constant play through, humor strengthened the appeal of the sixth movie and the plot. Jordan needs to look at the target audience for a movie like Harry Potter and that audience does not like to sit through three hours of a movie without a single humorous moment. My only advice is to stop watching movies like you are reading a book. It is the same problem I went through after watching the movies right after reading the book. The movies simply cannot be long enough to be watched the same as if reading the books. Expect things to be cut and to be disappointed with missing a few book moments that you wanted to be in the movie. After watching the movie for a second time it will take away from initial disappointments and I think you will stop your criticism. Overall, the movie followed the plot of the book exceptionally well, the only thing changed was the added destruction of the Burrow which is not really crucial when stopping to think about all the ways it is not needed in the seventh movie. The wedding is the only important scene for the Burrow and its location can be easily changed. The problems I have with the movie are more related to Kristin's views. I think that by putting Harry willfully beneath the rafters it takes away from the powers that Harry has developed throughout the years. Every curse he throws are easily deflected by even Fenrir, who in the book doesn't even have a wand. If there was one problem with the movie it is that they downplayed Harry's ability to fight Voldemort and his death eaters without a seventh year at Hogwarts. The fifth movie did the best at setting up Harry and the power Hogwart's youth has against the forces of evil. Without the battle at the end, I think we miss a set up that puts Harry ready to face what is out there as he is in the end of the fifth.
  • This is probably the lamest excuse ever, but i read the fifth book and that was in 2006 and i started getting busy and reading other books. Then the next movies came out and i didn't want to ruin the surprise of finding out what happens in the movies. I love movies and the anticipation for them coming out. But i am for sure going to go back and read them after the movies are done, which i gaurantee sounds dumb to you, haha.
  • matthewdeery
    how can you read 1-5 and not the last 2?!?! the last two books are the most sensational of the whole series...especially the last book, it will change your life. haha.
  • Weenis
    You guys are losers
  • Moosh
    And once again i'll state that i loved this movie. I saw it again last night and thought it was better the second time. the only grievance i have is that it didn't inevitabily end in an action sequence, say a wizard shoot out/ chase scene. Under the circumstances I'd say that's not hopin for too much. That's just a good ending to an otherwise methodical and dialogue-progressed flick. I mean am I right =P
  • mkay. i can understand that. i havent read this book so i see why you can say that. whatever is missing im sure will be explained in the last 2 movies
  • Kobes 2.0
    I definitely agree that you have to look at it as a movie and not as the movie FOR the book, but I think that the real issue isn't nitpicking, but that major plotpoints are missing. Now, they can fix this in the 7th book (they'll have to) by using the same starting scenario as this movie, which I actually really liked, but we just have to wait and see. Regardless, the acting really was phenomenal and it was a good movie, just disappointing when I expected so much more, especially from this book.
  • As a huge fan of the Harry Potter series (both movies and books) i have to state my opinion. Now, i did not read this book or the last one but i have read 1-5 and have so far loved the movies. With all movies you have to look at it differently than a book because no matter what, it is going to be different in some way. This movie was the best one of all. I went with a friend who has read all of the books and he has also said he loved it. The only things bad i have heard so far are some some nitpicking about some scenes which is understandable, but it is a movie and i think the cast and David Yates did an amazing job on this one.
  • matthewdeery
    I am going to agree with Kobes. I really loved the movie and its many wondrous scenes brought to life. I thought Yates direction really brought the emotion of the characters to the forefront. Acting great was great and so on. But the almost disregard for the book almost feels like a slap in the face to fans. I'm not talking about omitting story lines to make it a movie script, but the failure to stay true to the scenes you are showing us. I agree the shave quote from Dumbledore was out of place with the task laid directly before them. I also will agree that Gambon did not come off as the grandfatherly like character the book portrays. The relationship between Harry and Dumbledore flourishes in the book, and that is why his death is such an unreal devastation at the end. In the movie, I just did not feel completely sadness watching Dumbledore die. Partly because they writers changed the tower scene, and partly because Harry and Dumbledore never have those mentor and apprentice moments, even fatherly moments that Harry so desperately longed for minus parents. I was also pissed about Harry below instead of under the cloak. In the book Dumbledore sacrifices precious time to cast a spell to keep Harry safely hidden and only then Malfoy is able to disarm him. In the movie Malfoy just disarms the greatest wizard of all time straight up. Lame. It just makes Dumbledore seem like a pussy (even though he was in a weakened state). The absence of more of the memories was a let down too. What the hell were they thinking leaving out Dumbledore's memory of when Voldemort comes back to Hogwarts seeking employment?? That is a dynamite Dumbledore/Voldemort dialouge, especially because without this scene you completely leave out the UBER VILLIAN as he actually has transitioned to evil and no longer the handsome Tom Riddle...and in course leaves Ralph Finnes OUT OF THE MOVIE!! (wtf?) And why add the death eaters destroying the Burrow when you could have taken that scene, changed the setting to Hogwarts, the time to the end of the movie, and left the best part of the entire book playing out in the finale. The absence of the Order in the castle makes the good guys seem weak. That fight gives readers a sense of complete insecurity. No one is safe from the Dark Lord and his followers, not even at Hogwarts. I was also pissed about the cut dialogue between Snape and Harry outside Hogwarts, we want more!! The movie is based around Snape secretly being The Half Blood Prince! NO FUNERAL FOR DUMBLEDORE...RETARDED! And I will also agree that anyone just seeing the movies really have no sense for what there is to come. The movie did not even discuss the other Horcruxes which makes it a lot harder to introduce them in the very important final installment. The book uses the Horcrux storyline and the impending face off with Voldemort to wrench up the tension going into the last chapter. . The movie really failed to make very clear of what lies ahead for Harry, Ron, and Hermione. No Scrimgeour will really hurt too, bad move. Why can't they just make the potion in the cave GREEN like the book?? What is the point of changing it? What? Finally, I will once again agree with Kobe is saying that it felt like the writers of the script didn't really understand the most important elements of the book. I would also rate the movie higher strictly on a movie viewer basis, and rate it lower as a Potter fan. I believe this is the second best Potter. Second to the best movie/book adaptation and best overall project, The Prisoner of Azkaban. You know what I want? A CGI series of Harry Potter that is the exact books word for word played out in front of our eyes with the beautiful computer technology. Wouldn't it be awesome to see every part of every book??
  • Kobes 2.0
    I really wish that, like Lord of the Rings, they could've gotten one great director to do them well. These really should've been the best movies ever made, and they all fall short. Order of the Phoenix was good though, not gonna lie.
  • Kobes 2.0
    First off, I'm sorry for the ridiculously long post, but I just felt very strongly about some things in this movie. Obviously, as a HUGE Harry Potter Purist, I had issues with the additions of the center scene (at the Burrow) and the failures to do justice to the battle within Hogwarts, the scene at the top of the Astronomy Tower, the fact that Ginny hid the potions book herself (which leads me to wonder how Harry will find the diadem in the final book) as well as the major change at the end where they decide to hunt horcruxes on the Tower vs. at Dumbledore's funeral (ridiculous). Now, I honestly am willing to accept these changes because they don't necessarily cause huge issues in terms of the plot or quality of the current movie. However, my biggest issue is that this movie had by far the best acting, with Michael Gambon FINALLY properly portraying Dumbledore's calm and serene attitude, as well as the best storyline of the books, yet Yates seemed to create a movie as if he is not actually a fan of the books. I wonder if he had even read the 7th before creating this movie. The failure to include Scrimgeour, Bill and Fleur's relationship, as well as have Tonks and Remus develop their's (vs. already being together), really eliminates almost 1/4th of the most important scenes in the final book. Without these characters, we lose the wedding (where the Ministry finally falls) and Shell Cottage w/ the planning of breaking into Gringotts (which occurs at the cottage). Now, even Travis agrees that by losing these major portions of the 7th book, we as fans will not get to see justice done to some of Rowling's best writing. At the forefront of this idea is the death of Dobby, which, as Travis agrees with me, is among the best parts of all Harry Potter events as it allows us to see Harry really suffer and Dobby give his final act of devotion. On top of this, Dumbledore NEVER explained what the other horcruxes are in this movie. The end of the sixth book really shows a determination in Harry and his inability to let go of the the Locket, the Cup, the Snake, and something of Gryffindor or Ravenclaw. Thus, unless you are a fan of the books, you really are left wondering what the hell Harry is going to do next. And if you are a fan, you should be pretty upset at this failure. Also, just a short note, Dumbledore is the most important character in the books outside of Harry, and Yates' change of the funeral really shows a failure to understand the value of that character to not just Hogwarts, but the entire wizard world and the fan base of the books. So, I guess, if I was gonna rate this movie, you really have to look at it in 2 ways. As a stand-alone movie, Yates does a fantastic job drawing in audiences and the actors phenomenal performances succeed at bringing together a movie worthy of an A-/A.. But, as the book that lays a huge foundation for the entire end of the series and a book within a 7 story sequence, it falls woefully short of success and does no justice to the fans who expect, at the very least, visual representation and inclusion of crucial scenes from the book even if the Director opts to change minor things and add bits and pieces. Lavender was pretty good and funny, but if you cut out 5 minutes of her and ten of Bellatrix, the time could've been used to make this movie perfect. Yates did what he wanted, without really doing what was necessary. Conclusion: 15 more minutes and this could've been one of the best movies really ever made, for both fans of the books and non-readers.
  • Jordan
    My bad. Spectacular was not the right word. I would amend that to say that starting with the fourth and continuing with the fifth, the movies finally met my expectations and approval of what was important to translate from book to movie. From there, the sixth took a HUGE step back. Additionally, the only interest I have in the movie is to see how they think the text would play out in real life. I don't mind knowing whats going to happen. I know what to expect and merely wish to see it depicted on screen. Thats what was so strange with this movie. Its like they thought- everyone knows the books, lets throw surprises at them! I'm all for artistic license, (i.e. the students using "lumos" to erase the dark mark), but not making stuff up (Burrow attack scene) at the expense of more important events.
  • Moosh
    i'm sorry Jordan. You had many good points, unfortunately I can't take the post seriously. You called the Fourth movie, Goblet of Fire, spectacular (maybe outta context), but that movie was a complete and utter waste of film. The dialogue was forced and awkward, the scene transitions and plot development were lightning fast, thus leaving out important details, and to top things off, Ron and Harry looked like a hideous pair of chuds. Please defend if you feel the need, but I just had to take a shot at the complete piece of GARBAGE entitled Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. While a staunch Harry Potter book fan, I agree with Travis. This film was great. The only piece missing was an epic chase/spell shoot out at the end as the infiltrating Death Eaters retreated after Dumbledore's execution.
  • Jordan
    Also ridiculous are the conversations between Dumbledore and Harry. Dumbledore is a grandfatherly figure in the books. In the movie, he comes off as a crazy uncle. They are about to head off to the cave, the start of the climax of the book/movie, and he tells Harry he needs a shave? Absurd. It is forced and out of place, as were many comments. Then, the death eaters kill Dumbledore and walk out of the castle? The book emphasizes top notch security at Hogwarts, including members and Aurors. We even see Aurors outside the great hall at the beginning, apparantly they were sleeping by the end. The fourth and fifth movies were spectacular and I expected the sixth to build on it after the first three dissapointed. While you cannot argue with what you see visually on screen, the script was the worst of the six. Ultimately, I cannot be impressed with the visuals if the story isn't right. I accept that everyone takes different things from the books, even amongst "purists" but this was way off the mark. Yates should consult the Peter Jackson school of direction before the final 2 movies.
  • Jordan
    Obviously I will be revealed as a Potter Purist here. I like everything with the special effects and production of the on screen visuals. Everything looks how the wizarding world should. However, it is an understatement to say people will be disappointed by the faithfulness to the book. The most glaring is wasting time on the soap-opera love story that was elevated to a secondary plot. The seriousness of Voldemort's growing threat is right on, but I was distracted by a clear over-emphasis of the lovey-dovey stuff. I understand the need for comic relief to balance out the heavy themes, but I can think of a long list of things to provide that for the film besides another tired scene with Lavender drawing a breath-heart on the glass. The scene at the Weasley house was the most ridiculous, and rightfully so. What did making up that event add to the story or movie? Why not take the time to show us the Gaunt memory?
  • Kristin
    I completely agree in being disappointed in the movie's final moments. By placing Harry voluntarily under the floorboards (rather than bound and under his cloak) completely changes the mood of the scene. Additionally, the "invasion" of Hogwarts was completely ignored and I was excited to see the war in the Great Hall come to life on screen. I do agree with much of your praise, however, the end left much to be desired - and doesn't inspire a NEED for the next one as soon as possible.
blog comments powered by Disqus